Anti-racists help rise in black crime

 

In the 1960s, the images were all over the nightly news. Riots in Detroit, Los Angeles, Harlem, Anger from blacks boiled over, spurred on by Leftists and outfits like the Black Panthers and the urban League over poverty, crime and hopelessness against a white government and society they felt were leaving them to suffer, rot and die. And do much of it — robbery, murder, muggings, rape, was aimed at whites. By the 1980s it had died down and occasionally popped up sporadically. Now, just two decades into the new century the media can't help but report on interracial crime and the Internet has enabled whites to get a wider picture of interracial crime. And yes, we are no closer to preventing it than we were in the sixties. Yet, don't count on regular TV to keep you informed on black-on-white crime these days. Even if you live in, say, a US city where there's large black populations like Detroit, Buffalo, L.A. or Chicago, there's quite a bit of racial-toned violence that never makes it to the local 11 pm news (or for that matter, to The Buffalo News, Detroit Free Press, Chicago Tribune, etc.)

The anti-racist element in the media never gives the whole story on black-on-white crime. If a white man (or a cop) is accused of assaulting, killing or hurting any nonwhite, it becomes the number one hash-tagged topic all over, on CNN, Fox News, even international news channels like Russia Today and BBC News.

If you want the real details on the carnage, there are two sites I heartily recommend: The Council of Conservatives at http://conservative-headlines.com/ and New Nation News at http://www.newnation.org/ Both can be accessed at the www.natparty.com links page. Here's [sic] a few examples of the killing and maiming and kidnapping and rape and robbery that has been the hallmark of black people long before there was concern over the Bloods and the Cripps:

•   In Tuscaloosa, Alabama a black man has been charged by a Grand Jury with abusing and sodomizing a nine-year old girl.

•   In Virginia a black man is charged with killing an 83-year old roommate.

•   In Boston, a police officer was shot in the face in an unprovoked attack by a black thug.

•   In Tacoma, Washington, a black mob attacked a homeless man.

•   Seven black men and women are being hunted for  attacking whites on Baltimore's Transit System.

The thing to note here is that there was no real local outrage, no call for a crackdown by mayors or police chiefs, no call for toughening up laws on young punks out to get whitey by any means necessary. That's because the anti-white  media leftists, feminists and other anti-racists birdbrains have amped up their tactic of censoring, altering, omitting and just not reporting at all on black and black-on-white crime. There's a certain sense of entitlement burned into young blacks' consciousness, and not just by charlatans like Reverend Al Sharpton. It's an attitude that is forged every now and then by TV series and novels like Roots, which was in the 1970's reinforced by all those 'blaxploitation' films like Shaft, Superfly, Across 110th Street and recently, Django Unchained. Th justification? "Whites abducted blacks en masse for cheap slavery, so playing Knockout with Whitey is just the latest payback installment" . Slavery, of any kind, let's be clear here, is evil, not only by itself as a form of human forced, bondage but also because slavery destroys the slaver: instead of building his own homeland with his own labor, he sneakily uses nonwhites and eventually, they are part of his society. In the USA, at the end of slavery, slaves were given forty acres and a mule and allowed to live as settlers and farmers. We didn't return them to their racial homeland, we gave them new areas to live, to grow communities of their own and, up to today, to compete for education, jobs, welfare and opportunities galore.

Today, blacks and another nonwhites make up the majority of those tried, convicted and jailed for violent crime, but you'd never know it from the NBC Nightly News or ABC World News Tonight or even PBS Newshour. Prisons across the US are tinderboxes filled beyond capacity with black criminals who have spent most of their adulthood there, and who run many of them through violence and fear. In cities in the US and Canada, there's [sic] no-go areas that only see a police presence when it's time to call in the plainclothes homicide detectives and the coroner.

There's also the danger that any white who point this out can usually count on being scorned as a "hater" or a bigot, and may land in the radar of the local human rights council/commission or the local TV news or radio talk show host. Some even think it's okay to commit acts of violence against racists; up here, Toronto AM radio host Paul Mott recently bleated on the air about how he'd like to punch racists in the face. If you're white, you're fair game, but nonwhites get a pass — "I can understand that young man's anger." The laws and courts aren't helpful, either. Young blacks who commit violent crime are not put in hard-time jail, but get free counseling, "diversion" programs, and mollycoddling that defies sanity. Then, they're back on the street grinning from ear to ear and ready to pick up where they left off. In Canada, our totally nuts "Youth Criminal Justice Act" assures that young nonwhites who commit violent crime don't get punished for it.

And here in Canada, we're getting our first tastes of young black/gang crime, now being reported. And what do we do about it? Carding? Racial profiling? No, that's "racism." That's violating their rights, that's giving them the same rights as a man with a Diplomatic License Plate to commit murder and mayhem. That's just a young man/ young men lashing out at a society where they "have no hope." Reverse it, with a rare black victim and a white perpetrator, and it's time for more anti-racist laws, reports, seminars, many of them paid for with your tax dollars, too.

Wherever there's [sic] large concentrations of nonwhites, there will be massive violent crime. It's getting tiresome to stress how much whites who have to live with this danger in their neighborhoods, businesses, transit systems. etc., have to start being proactive. Form patrols with equipment and some husky locals who can probably do a better job than all the surveillance cameras, which only give an illusion of safety and nothing to deter, prevent or reduce violent crime. The politicians and the media only aggravate the problem and the cops are double afraid — of entering no-go ghettoized/gang-occupied areas in  force and of the "legal repercussions" of shooting a young black man — not to mention a repeat of Ferguson.

We live in cities of anarchy now, that only those rich enough to afford resulting in gated communities can feel safe in. We can thank the lying media and the traitorous race traitors moistening chairs at city hall for this. It's way past time we told them, the media that we're not going to take it anymore, and that whites need a Defense League of our own, if they refuse to protect us with all that money in their budgets earmarked for international festivals, sports spectaculars and Gay Pride Week.

It's up to you to do something — or will you, too,  wait until the censoring of race crime and the soft treatment of nonwhite criminals take their toll on you or some you love?
 

Poor white Canadians discarded like garbage by multicult elitists

 

"The poor are always with us." That may be true, but the multicult-loving elitists have better things to spend the billions of tax dollars on then trying to help the most vulnerable in this nation. Nope, the b.s. feminist war on Islam and the all male "ISIS" state emerging elsewhere 'threatens us all', so sorry, there's going to be no money to feed the hungry and house the homeless for the foreseeable future.

If reading this doesn't make you angry about the priorities of our elected officials and those who put them there, you need to give your head a shake. Every day, on the streets, in alleyways, in public parks, all around us, the vulnerable and needy. growing more and more each day in Canada, putting lie to the smarmy phony political platitudes of politicians, capitalists and elitists that everything's fine in Canada, we feel sorry for the poor, and here's another hundred or so great plans that will help them. Vote for us.  That's the feeling of not just our so-called representatives but every greedy fat cat whose thoughts and priorities rest with the status of his RRSP plan, or maybe, if he ends up in hospital room he can afford, the tender loving care of Filipino nurses. And even if he's not running a bank, but doing okay, so many Canadians are too preoccupied with attaining more money and, if single, more sex and women.

Food costs are skyrocketing. There's no affordable nutritious meat for the poor, who must subsist on hot dogs and TV dinners. Except for the rich, beef is off the menu, unless you're part of the elite, the privileged, the trendy anti-racist Left, all of whom are participating in the destruction of the community in Canada, in large and small towns. As for the supposedly-influential and supposedly compassionate women, they've failed us. I don't care how many pictures there are of them tending to soup kitchens. Thanks to the multicult and job-stealing open-immigration policies these females supported at the ballot box, the poor are now relegated to the coffee shops of the nation, while white traitors and their snooty wives dine at fancy restaurants, gobbling up $20.00 breakfasts while whites are braving the cold last days of winter and later the summer's heat, looking for shelters. Many of the poor are in such bad health, they are starting to resemble the famous statue-heads on Easter Island — sunken, lost and devoid of hope.

And no one of these so-called compassionate Liberals or NDP — no one — is advocating for a boost in municipal and provincial welfare rates and payments large enough to give a sense of dignity to the poor. There's more austerity here, just like in Europe and in the US. Instead, as we've seen under Rob Ford locally, there's more austerity, more privatization and cuts in services. These whites don't care about Canada or what even "average" Canadian families have to live on and endure. Our concerns are irrelevant as the live the "life of Reilly" on our backs.

And there's no concern when those on assistance are told to come to the office for a worker update or to get their OHIP cards updated. Since when can the poor afford  the $3 TTC fare back and forth to keep from getting welfare cut off or reduced? Historically, whites have been hard done by in Canada, ever since the days of the young British boys and girls shipped over here — or rather, shanghaied — and given to farms  for cheap labor (the great book The Little Immigrants gives a great account of the efforts of England's Dr. Barnardo and the charity that still operates under his name today). 

These kids, and those born after them, transformed a once-white Canada into the nation of today where literally anyone of any background can be a "Canadian"... and if you're white, you'll be cut off and abandoned should you ever God forbid need serious medical help or the basic sustenance of survival.  Chances are you will have to apply at Service Ontario, or whatever municipal office looks after welfare, to someone who can't speak English, or trying to get by on pidgin English,  just to get what's supposed to already be your birthright. Bilingualism and the cost of it on food packages, road signs, government documents, forms and services, has downgraded English, much like the practice of texting has robbed our kids of English literacy.

"White privilege"? Give me a break. I speak as an experienced poor Canadian, having grown up and knowing what it is like to be poor, to worry over things like rent or hydro. Even that is expensive and unreliable now thanks to austerity and importing our power to the USA, phone service or home, heating, unlike these wealthy parasitic vipers who hand their wealth, positions and businesses down to their kids as they take off on another holiday cruise or if retired, up to that dream cottage in Muskoka.

But just as there was a reckoning — in jail — for the callous, wealthy gang on Seinfeld, whose relationships with all outside their quartet resulted in injury, loss of money, property damage, deportation and in a few instances, death, so one day, there will hopefully be a reckoning for those leeches everywhere who live it up at the expense of the poor and those barely getting by. To use the Biblical phrase, the humbled will be exalted and the exalted will be humbled. It's happened in the past around the world in events that shaped our history. We're way overdue to see the comedown of the elites after so many years of being forced to eat garbage and being treated like garbage.

 

 

Dying TV's future still looks good

 

As The Cure once sang, it's the end of the world. At least, if you're a TV viewer in Canada. last week's pronouncements of the Canadian Radiotelevision Telecommunications Commission will assure that by this time next year, your enjoyment of TV won't be the same. TV is dying in its present form, yet its future is looking good.

For years, a bone of contention with many Canadians who get their TV service from big outfits like Rogers or Shaw Media or Bell TV/Fibe, was having to take what was offered to them in the "bundles" they offered customers. They paid (and still pay) a pretty penny for Canadian and US networks — plus a lot of networks and channels they didn't want or watch. The resulting furor led to the feds re-examining how TV services are delivered in this nation — and was especially ramped up when new ways of watching TV (Netflix, Hulu, Yahoo TV, etc.) caught on like wildfire in the USA and now up here with services like Bell's new Crave TV.

The new regulations, which are still being tinkered with, will give us more a la carte services— what's being finalized is a system where you'll pay $25 for what's called "skinny basic" — a smattering of Canadian local channels and US feeds of ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC, and a pick-and-pay option where you add more of what you want. And yep, they'll find a way to milk more dough out of you if they can't keep you shelling out the same amount of money for what you prefer now. Remember, these are big companies trying to play catch-up with the Internet competition south of the border, and after you deal with the big players like Bell or Rogers or even smaller ones like Eastlink and Quebec's Videotron, you only will get what they offer, no matter if it's a la carte or the smaller bundles they will make available.

It's a good thing for those of you unhappy with having to get Celebrity Name Game on ten US channels or Fatal Vows, now running on multiple Canadian channels, or if you'd rather have a sports-loaded package instead of the little woman's favorite channels like Cosmo TV, W and Lifetime. But just as the CRTC had so much enthusiasm when its head Jean Pierre Blais made the big announcement last week, CEOs all over the nation fretted that so many people would turn away from 'specialty channels' like APTN, DIY, FYI and religious channels like CTS, now YES TV and EWTN and the unemployment ranks would swell. Advocates for Canadian broadcasting were livid at the prospect of Canadian content regulations being eased. How much of Steven and Chris can we take in one week?.

It's true that more and more North Americans are unhooking their cable and satellite services in favor of getting TV over the Internet. And while Americans are getting used to it by adapting (Cable mega-giant Comcast's solution was to buy NBC), up here, there's a lot of sweaty brows in boardrooms faced with a new economic reality: change, or see half their on-air offerings and stations/networks then own disappear like the UPN network did  in the 1990's. After all, there's hardly a TV watcher who hasn't been hosed by the big boys, in billing, in crappy service, and just trying to get help when there's a channel or two that goes out. No wonder many Canadians are welcoming the new future of TV here. It's a tall order to keep the board members happy with the bottom line while not pricing themselves out of business. If the new regulations lead to truly great Canadian TV like Murdoch Mysteries, slick and well-done shows that can and do hold their place on the international TV stage, we all can win in this new development. Hopefully we won't end up with fare like The New Front Page Challenge or Return of The Beachcombers as what is passable for Canadian TV.

For the past few seasons, our national broadcaster CBC has used the promotional tag, "Canada lives here"—which is sort of what the CRTC wants to promote — TV that tells our stories, our take on international events, not crank out the local version of Big Brother.

As a people who pay so much for TV, for the CBC, for cable, satellite and Internet streaming services, and tax dollars for the many television program development funds run by Bell, Shaw and Corus, among others, we have a stake in Canadian television's future. Let's all take a closer look at our investment and react positively or negatively as warranted, and push for better TV and better TV access across the land.

And you should let your voice be heard — by the big boys at Rogers, Bell, et al, and also to the CRTC. It's your TV and your money. If you don't speak out, it soon might not be your choice.
 

 

Today's music not white man's music

 

"Music today is organized noise." Not along ago, someone wise uttered that phrase. The fact that an Atlanta hip-hop record production uses that as its title with the 's' in noise replaced by a 'z', underlines the dearth of music as a reflection of the white man's culture.

Turn on a radio and you'll spend a lot of time trying to find a station that plays classical music —Beethoven, Mahler, Mozart — the men whose contributions to music that uplifted and elevated the very definition of music many years ago, are scarce. Even 'swing music', the danceable tunes made popular by orchestra leaders like Benny Goodman and Tommy and Jimmy Dorsey — are only around in old movies. Today, the kids listen to the caterwauling from  the likes of Robin Thicke, Bruno Mars, Taylor Swift. And in the fine tradition of Jews like producers Clive Davis, Lou Adler, who made singer/songwriter Carole King a musical Top 40 icon, Brian Epstein, manager of the Beatles, Herb Alpert and Jerry Moss, whose A&M Records gave us Supertramp, The Carpenters and Cat Stevens, now Yousif Islam), pop, rap and rock rake in billions each year in spite of technology that makes songs available everywhere. Even country and western music, once the preserve of Hank Williams, Johnny Cash and Carl Perkins, has been given over to pop/rock "crossover" artists like Shania Twain.

I grew up with Top 40 Radio. In Toronto, CHUM AM, now TSN Sports Radio, promoted the hell out of hits with its weekly "Chum Chart" that many consider a priceless collectable now. Like Dick Clark, Alan Freed, "Murray The K" Kaufman, and so many hustlers who made stars out of drug-sozzled "minstrels" like The Rolling Stones, the Doors, and creeps like Alice Cooper. the itchy palmed ones who ran the big music labels like RCA, Columbia and Warner Brothers saw a gold mine in pop, soul and its predecessor jazz, folk music, acid rock and protest songs like John Lennon's Give Peace A Chance and Imagine. They learned, just as they did with movies and TV, that you'll never go broke appealing to the lowest common denominator. The success of 60's songs about drugs, the hot disco hits of the '70s, the nihilistic punk rock of the 80s, right up to today's mix of God-knows what Bruno Mars is singing about, proves that point. Just make sure that modern music is "raceless" in tone — okay, we'll have a little redneck rock like Lynrd Skynrd and let some skinheads release some tension singing Oy, Oy, Oy, but that's it — can't be encouraging lots of racial pride or nationalism: it's bad for business.

With FM arriving, bands like Black Sabbath. the Grateful Dead and the like, teenagers continued the rapt obsession with rock and roll carefully introduced on the airwaves with rockabilly entertainers like Bill Haley, Jerry Lee Lewis and Elvis Presley, right up to today's songs buried in technological beats. Music critics who laid into things like Isaac Hayes' Theme from Shaft were tarred as racists and bigots when they told it like it was — it's not music! — were and are today dismissed as racists or un-hip old fogies.

Music, like good literature, could tell great stories of history. Marty Robbin's song about The Alamo and Johnny Horton's Battle of New Orleans, even Jimmy Dean's '60's tribute to naval hero John F. Kennedy PT 109 were all big hits. Up here, Canadian Gordon Lightfoot's The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald is a beautiful, haunting piece of music about a real tragedy, alongside his chronicle of the building of the Canadian railway Canadian Railroad Trilogy. I have yet to see Drake, or even any still-around folk singer like Ian Tyson put together a piece of music worthy of those "Canadian History Minutes" that pop up on Canadian TV.

What is it about this junk that people have the nerve to equate with music? So much, especially rap and hip-hop, is lifted from someone else's composition. Right now, the estate of Motown's late warbler Marvin Gaye is involved in lawsuits involving two of his hits, the best- known being the contention over the similarities between Robin Thicke's hit Blurred Lines, and Gaye's Got To Give It Up. The theme music from the Will Smith flick Wild Wild West was taken from the Stevie Wonder hit I Wish (with Stevie's blessing — he even appears in the song's video.

Plagiarism aside, there's nothing spiritually uplifting about modern music; Jews continue to run it like Sony Music's Edgar Berger, Universal Music's Max Hole, and many others who see music as a cash cow that can be exploited in so many ways, especially with the technological advances that make it so omnipresent in our day. Music — real music — has the power to inspire ideas and touch the hearts and souls of us. To hell with composing something along the lines of Beethoven's Fifth, or Dvorak's New World Symphony — there's no market out there, Jews can't use it to sell booze or running shoes or Doritos or whatever. It exists now as a source of revenue and nothing more.

And that's sad and tragic. When you hear stuff like Thrift Shop or Uptown Funk, imagine after hearing them, say, Vivaldi's The Four Seasons, and there's no contest. Pop music, and the spoiled male and female brats who perform it, hopefully, will experience a downturn soon — and I don't mean hearing it replaced by a Tony Bennett/Bono duet.

White man's music needs to get back to its real roots, back to the songs of European nations you only used to hear in events like Toronto's Caravan Festival or in ethnic halls, and reflective of the cultures and histories of the European people who actually created music and sang it and taught it to their kids as a legacy to be treasured and protected, not mocked as being 'old fashioned' and replaced by tripe like Carly Rae Jepsen's  "Call Me Maybe."

Do yourself a favor. Find a store selling classical music or find it online and play it — sans earphones or ear buds — and make your teens listen to it. Teach them what  white man's music is. And when you hear about European cultural music events, attend them , don't wait for European Heritage Week this fall.

What we ignore and fail to pass on to our generations will soon disappear— and that's always been the goal of the kosher rulers of the worldwide music industry, to flood and bombard the younger generations' ears and brains, to use music as a divider and alienation tool aimed  generations and families — and make a quick buck from it too.

Think about that next time you turn on Kiss Fm or Virgin Radio.

 

The Trouble with Trekkies

 
Last week, fan-boys and fan girls were saddened to learn of the death of Leonard Simon Nimoy, who died at 72 after quitting smoking thirty years ago. Nimoy created one of the most popular television characters — the half-human/half alien Vulcan named Mr. Spock who served aboard the Starship Enterprise on the TV and film franchise Star Trek, culminating in appearing in the last ST film Into Darkness as an Ambassador. Spock, the product of the ultimate in miscegenation — an Earth mother and a Vulcan father — never displayed — well, hardly ever — emotion, lying to us early in the series that "with no emotion, there's no war". As science officer, he was the brainiac of the show, a forerunner of that Star Wars cabbage head Yoda, calm, cool and mysterious with his pointed ears and Beatle bangs. He became in the hearts of generations an icon treated like a god.

I never was a big fan of Star Trek — or its weird idea of creatures from planets and cultures from all over the galaxy not only traveling across the cosmos trying to restore peace and stop wars in the distant future, but working together like robe-garbed cult members. The show was basically an orbiting United Nations and you'd really have to stretch your imagination further than its originator Gene Roddenberry as it and its spinoffs (Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager and Enterprise) came and went.

There were the Klingons, a warrior people who were at first enemies of the United Federation of Planets (UN in Space); by the second series, one, Worf (Michael Dorn), was serving as an Star Fleet officer alongside Geordie LaForge, (LeVar Burton), a blind engineer who wore a special visor that allowed him to see. Both were played by Afro-American actors. On Voyager, there was "Seven of Nine" a drop-dead gorgeous Borg who, like Next Generation's android Data, wasn't even human.

Star Trek did some pretty daring things for the mid-1960s on NBC. It put a black woman, Lieutenant Uhura, in charge of ship's communications. Most of the time she was all business, even in her Star Fleet short-hemmed uniform. She participated with William Shatner (Captain James Kirk) in TV's first inter-racial kissing scene. As the various Star Trek series debuted, the aliens got freakier-looking, but sort of more human. On Deep Space Nine, there was a running battle between the space station's cop Odo (Rene Auberjonois) and hustler Ferengi bartender / con artist Quark; the station was run by one Benjamin Sisko, another black guy played by Avery Brooks who did the single-dad thing with his son Jake. And that's not counting the last two Star Trek reincarnations, Voyager (female captain) and Enterprise.

Gene Roddenberry, who created the series, had a vision of mankind that was against "natural racism," yet every now and then the show would fluctuate between anti-racism opuses (Kirk and the crew try to straighten out a planet whose culture was modeled on Nazi Germany in one story, and in the episode Let That Be Your Last Battlefield, meddle in a war between two alien races — the hitch is, they are both duo-colored, but each on reverse sides of their faces.

Anyone who has just even casually seen Star Trek can't help but know there's an anti-white political agenda here — and let's remember it's been going on since 1966, when the series first debuted. There's hardly a nation anywhere that doesn't have any of the Star Trek series playing on at least one station or channel. Every major actor in all of the series have done very well for themselves, not to mention the folks at Paramount Pictures/TV, Adam Goodman, head of its film group and its owners at Viacom, such as CEO Sumner Redstone. Sci-fi conventions have played host to millions of Trekkies and billions have been made on toys, merchandising, videos, books, etc. It's an industry unto itself.

But it's the underlying, anti-racist/pro-miscegenation message that generations have flocked to like some 1960s hippie cult and have infected so many, especially the never-grown-up boys in moms' basements.

It's almost enough to jog your memory back to one of the series' few comedic stories, The Trouble with Tribbles, and make you wish those little furballs would have the Enterprise crew for dinner. 

 

Same TV schlock coming this fall

 

I know, the ground's frozen solid. But down in Hollywood, it's pilot season — the feverish annual campaign to pare down over 100 ideas peddled to the networks and come up with thirty or so new Big Bang Theorys or the next hit police show. And If you're a man child who gorges on fantasy/superhero fare like CW's Reign and The Flash, Fox's Gotham or ABC's Once Upon A Time, good news! There's more boring crap on the way, with pilots being shot series greenlighted and the last stages of development now on for another pile of electronic dung being ready to be fed to your TV and mobile device.  Forget anything vaguely nationalist-promoting, but more anti-white/ pro-anti-terrorism cops and spies, super-powered vigilantes taking the law into their own hands, banshee women, dysfunctional families and ridicule of the elderly. Here's a really early fall TV preview from Heavy Bee.

At Fox, the folks who brought you The Simpsons and the Griffins, have planned Luther, an Americanized version of the British cop show, about a black Kojak/Cracker sleuth, tracking down brutal homicidal, and likely, white, monsters, along with Rob Lowe, coming off Parks and Recreation to the new Grinder, about a lawyer who takes over the family firm  — like Andrea Martin did on Canada's Working the Engels.

At CBS, the feminist drama The Good Wife may soon be joined by TV's most politically-correct legal drama, Doubt; the centerpiece is Laverne Cox, who's not only a lawyer, she also used to be a he (You can hear the double entendres flying already). Also on tap is a new Criminal Minds spinoff, with ex-CSI: NY  star Gary Sinese going after serial killers overseas. Another new show is Limitless, spun off from the movie of the same name, all about a drug used to solve crimes instead of landing their users in the pokey. You're harshing [sic] my buzz, and you're the killer, dude. And, those who enjoyed the film flop Supergirl, rejoice. It's also a series contender for the fall, with the film's original star Helen Shaver and former Superman Dean Cain as part of the cast. There's also a TV version of the Rush Hour films that starred Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker as a black-and-Oriental team of chop-socky wisecracking cops.

ABC has Quantico, all about young, new CIA recruits who'll likely take great training classes like Waterboarding 101 or How to Violate Citizens' Rights and Get Away With It.  Chevy Chase stars in another untiled pilot about two selfish retired people (it fits him like a glove). Johnny Knoxville (Jackass, Men In Black II) is being prepped for a series based on his earlier years in Tennessee. Considering this guy got famous watching people half-kill themselves. you can pretty well figure how this new comedy might turn out.

NBC's developing a dramedy called Telenovela, produced by Latina former-Desperate Housewife Eva Longoria. There's also a martial arts drama called The Warrior starring Will Yun Lee (The Wolverine). No word on any white doctors, lawyers or other types of heroes headlining shows this fall on this network.

The CW mini-network is already looking for another spooky show to join Supernatural and the soon-to-air I-Zombie, with the tentative title Cheerleader Death Squad, set in a prep school and bound to glorify more brutal killers each week.

These shows have basically two kinds of people who create, pitch, produce act and program them: Adolescents who couldn't care about accuracy, historical or otherwise, and just want an hour of Dungeons and Dragons fantasy to go by; and politically-correct leftist souls of whatever sexual orientation wanting to see the TV world look more like their warped universe, where kids are to derided, the elderly and the nuclear family non-existent, and race is a four-letter word. And, in a time when the media want to distract you from all the bad stuff they gin up and make you forget all the wars against those 'ISIS terrorists', you can bet that the more outlandish a TV concept is, the more likely it'll be in the Top Twenty shows, like ABC's multicult mess Modern Family or the CBS pilot Doubt (see above).

In mid-May, the five US networks will unveil their final fall schedules, and there is a possibility that half of what's on the drawing board won't make it to a weekly schedule. But given that the hot shows right now involve among other concepts a black teacher of How To Get Away With Murder, a Taiwan immigrant family sitcom titled Fresh Off The Boat, and the train wreck small-town family of The Middle, "the Jews" in charge of the broadcast networks and cable channels and streaming services like Netflix and Hulu, will try to outdo each other with propaganda, anti-white hate slickly packaged to make you laugh at your own race's demise, and next year's "big hits."

See you in the spring, when we'll see which of the above made the cut.

 

 

Not much 'Americana' in America

 

Americans, they love to boast, right? They're the greatest nation on Earth, with the highest standard of living, a history to be proud of, great entertainment, and a culture everyone loves. Why else would so many crash borders and fences and sneak in every year?

When we think of "Americana" many images come to mind: baseball, hot dogs, the malt shop, the nice girl next door. And before World War II, a mostly-white population. Ethnic minorities were a novelty, a gimmick used to liven up comedies (like black train porters, Al Jolson's blackface shtick (actually performed by a Jew in blackface makeup, Asa Yoelson), Jack Benny's radio and TV foil Eddie "Rochester" Anderson. And there was the Oriental, presented as a funny servant in shows like Bonanza or Bachelor Father, or as a wily deductive genius in mystery stories like Earl Der Bigger's Charlie Chan. Crazy dances like the Jitterbug, then later the Twist and the Frug (where you didn't touch your dance partner) were all the rage. Fashion, zoot suits, floppy hats that made men look like women during the Jazz Age, also emasculated men, making them look like idiots and peacocks showing off to land that little sweetie in the flapper dress. The discos and dances like The Hustle  in the 1970s continued that sad tradition.

There's not much "Americana" in the United States of America now. Gone are the sage father images from such TV shows from the early days like Father Knows Best, My Three Sons and others. TV then was more reflective of society as a medium, when America was a patriarchal land where Dad was King, the Man of the House, who commanded authority and respect. These days in the media, he's a lout, a souse, a philanderer/voyeur and a ne'er-do-well. Even dads in films are a pathetic lot. In Joe Somebody, Tim Allen is a dad who clocks a man for no good reason. Allen parked in a spot reserved for certain employees. Adam Sandler took on father roles in many of his films — like Grown Ups and That's My Boy — and a bad one he was. The strong, courageous yet caring dad has been replaced by the schemers, the adolescent latter day John Belushi train wrecks, and the dads who just can't connect with their kids, like Mike Heck, the constantly-bewildered dad on ABC's The Middle or Tim Allen on Last Man Standing.

After World War II, the returning veterans had a lot to celebrate coming home to their families and girls — and celebrate they did, as the first of the dances where you didn't hold onto your partner — the Jitterbug in the 1930's, popularized in a song by black jazz man Cab Calloway, to Chubby Checker's The Twist in the 1960s, Girls started to call the shots, on the dance floor, and soon, at home and at the workplace, and when feminism hit its stride in the 1970s, the man's place as the breadwinner and the head of the house had faded to almost nothingness. This was helped along by the slew of anti-male sitcoms, movies and plays that abounded. The Odd Couple, one of the nastiest anti-male pieces by Jew[ish] playwright Neil Simon, has two repulsive males, a compulsive slob and an effeminate fussy neat-freak living together after their wives divorce them. It was a hit play, a hit movie and has just started its second TV reboot now on CBS. The hit Frasier stars Kelsey Grammer as a pompous psychiatrist who winds up with egg on his face in almost every story and who is beset by his divorced brother Niles, bullying radio host slob Bulldog, and his stereotypical cranky dad Martin.

By the end of the last century, "Cosmopolitan" had graduated from a magazine lauding feminist lifestyles to an adjective for the high life. Cosmo TV, the W, Lifetime and OWN (Oprah Winfrey) networks were among the biggest-rated cable channels in North America, and women's fashion and cosmetics industries like Donna Karan, Revlon, Clairol and Maybelline were pulling in big bucks. There were a few guy-oriented channels like The Men's Channel in Canada, which folded a few years ago, and though there's a mini-resurgence in man-oriented things. Discovery has just launched its new Velocity channel, the so-called "metrosexual" and the effeminate male still is prominent in media, culture and the choice of feminists.

Remember Westerns? Before they faded into the sunset, they were filled with tough guys shooting threatening Indians, beating the daylights out of each other in bar fights, and taking down outlaws with six-shooters. Then came films like 1952's High Noon — a sheriff must face outlaws alone when a whole town is too scared to back him up — and Brokeback Mountain, gay love on the range. When was the last time you saw a cowboy as tough on TV as Gunsmoke's Matt Dillon, James Arness? On TV, even male cops and private detectives aren't normal — they all have some quirk or disability: Ironside solved crimes from a wheelchair, Columbo was a slob with a mind like a steel trap, The late Rock Hudson's McMillan had his dippy wife Sally getting involved in his investigations. That show was clearly derived from moviedom's first man woman sleuths, Nick and Nora Charles' 1930s Thin Man films).

With the media's pre-occupation with "ISIS," the endless parade of goofy dads and scheming frat-house men and Muslims replacing Nazis as the screen's new arch-bad guys, it's hard finding a positive, male patriarchal image in films and TV. Maybe if we all stop fawning and slapping down our dough to see these horrific examples of men in the media, it would send a message. Or if Americans boycotted shows who portray the modern American man in such negative ways, Hollywood and New York just might get the hint.

Meanwhile, if you want to see what the patriarchal American male was like, go to your video store and stock up on some old classic Westerns or the Andy Hardy series.
 

 

Police promoted plots

 

"Terror" — it's everywhere, not just in the bad action movie plots, but also everyday in the papers, TV and radio news and the Internet. They're out there! They're among us, plotting and planning, look what they did in Ottawa, look at the great job the Mounties did in breaking up that Via Rail plot. Yes, they're "out there." And not just in Canada, but in the US, Australia, Belgium, London. They're boarding planes, they're making plans in dark basements, with shadow figures lurking in the background.

There are two realities at work here in the real world: One, there's [sic] a lot more plots being hatched and planned than there are actions. To peruse the media all the time, you'd think something was getting blown up or someone killed every hour on the hour in time for the next news cycle or radio talk show blowhard to "gas away" on. Two, many of these plots have a common thread: the participation of the law enforcement establishment, more often than not, on the federal level. Lots of your money goes to pay the salaries and operations of these agents and to pay for the surveillance equipment, manpower, record-keeping, etc., that goes into any police operation.

Let's take the VIA rail plot, for which on Friday, testimony was heard in court that a "chance" meeting between an FBI agent and one of the plotters. As part of the probe of the plot, the accused defense lawyer asked the G-man if he was ordered to establish a relation with one of the alleged plotters, to which he replied in the affirmative. It's right out of Hitchcock's Strangers On A Train, where two people who meet on a train, each  planning to kill someone, agree to swap murders. And it's not old hat. Agent-provocateurs have been around for decades. In the sixties and seventies, the Left was a target for FBI/RCMP agents to stir the anger pot and nudge people, even help them plan acts of violence. Lately, though, the feds have been concentrating and hatching schemes to involve " radical right-wingers, Klan, Neo-Nazis, racists, etc. to do mayhem, then at the right time scoop up a whole chapter of men to face trial and many years in prison. Look at the Bayou of Pigs incident, a story that already spawned a book and may yet see its way to your local movie theater.

Last week, police in Nova Scotia congratulated themselves in stopping a plot by two young people to commit a latter day literal Saint Valentine's Massacre/mass public shooting. The news on this was so widespread, it even made CNN. It got all the pseudo-pundits crying that no one is safe — again.

We all remember the Leftist outfits who made and advocated mayhem, from the Weathermen to the FLQ to the SLA to the Trotskyites and Maoists in the sixties and the seventies, to today's anarchists and the Black Bloc. These older groups are pretty much gone now and many of their followers are retired or dead.

Here, from 1989 to 2005, CSIS had a great partner in the government-funded Heritage Front, a ready-made racist outfit standing up for equal rights for whites" complete with a website, glossy magazine, supporters, even a figurehead, its leader Wolfgang Droege. So famous were [sic] the HF that it spawned the book Web of Hate, and a CBC movie White Lies starring Sara Polley and Lynn Redgrave.

Cops really don't care that there are a lot of angry people out there who have no ideology about politics whatsoever. The ones with identifiable and strong political views or religious convictions, like racists and fundamentalist Muslims, are easier to keep track of. And some of those angry ones who read and see and hear about the successful, foiled and cooked-up-at-headquarters plots are getting inspired to do their own bloodbaths. Therein lies the serious danger to all of us. Just over the past while, there's been all these university campus shootings, the tragedy at Sandy Hill, to those two monsters in Columbine, and that lunatic on trial now for the murders in Colorado at the premiere of the last Batman movie. Who's to say what news stories of terror plots egged them on and convinced any or all of them that mass murder is the best way to get more than fifteen minutes of fame? Are we to believe that every one of them is a lone wolf, a time bomb waiting to go off? Some of them get really famous in the media: the "Unabomber" Ted Kaczynski, the shoe bomber Richard Reid, became some of the most feared criminals of the past few decades.

The Canadian Security and Intelligence Service was created in the wake of the revelations of RCMP break-and-enter/agent provocateur shenanigans and sure enough, when the heat was off the Mounties, it was business as usual, this time under the banner of new agency with a weird logo. It's a sad and serious world when law enforcement, with the blessing and financing of the government/taxpayer, engages in these stupid  "terror plot" games. When these games/plots/raids/captures become widely publicized, there is the possibility of giving an impetus to people with no political agenda. But no matter: the police and media will gladly justify their existence by dubbing them all as terror plots. 

By planning and provoking violence against the public and not having to be accountable when exposed, and justifying it like America does, in the name of homeland security, law enforcers at all levels of government pose a real threat to freedom to any vestige of democracy and to every Canadian.

To paraphrase the title of a 1970's book, they are the real subversives.

 

The media’s dumb white men

 

My dad wasn't an Einstein, but he had his own intelligence; he fixed cars and believe me, idiots can't do that, especially nowadays with so many cars being half-computers. To look at TV today, there's no shortage of white comedy show characters who have the intelligence of a lima bean. They're never smarter than their wives. They scheme and get caught every time. They never talk back to the "missus." Did I mention they're all whites?

Inventions of the past two centuries, and their creators, are hardly ever credited, unless you count the white man Dr. James Naismith, creator of basketball, which became dominated by nonwhites, many tall enough to just plunk the ball in the hoop. Ethnic whites are the butt of so many jokes. German Nazis, East Europeans and Slavs are portrayed as quick-tempered slobs, and what's more famous for a northern white stereotype than a rampaging Viking?)

Brits haven't been uplifted in the media much from the wimps they were portrayed as in films and TV. Now in its third season is CBS' Elementary, starring Johnny Lee Miller as a modern skew on Sherlock Holmes, running at the same time as BBC's Sherlock. Quirky to the point of disturbing, his performance will remind you of Law & Order's Detective Goren. And, unlike the classic films starring Basil Rathbone, the "Gad, Holmes!" Nigel Bruce has been replaced by svelte, brainy, skirt-wearing Lucy Liu.

The Big Bang Theory stands alone in its portrayal of a group of brainy young men who specialize in various fields of science, but are totally clueless and clumsy in modern social situations , especially with women. they're all sci-fi fan boys who never pass up a chance to dress like superheroes or discuss Doctor Who or Star Trek with the same reverence a priest conducts mass. The leader, a whiny Texan (yes—whiny Texan) named Sheldon Cooper, fumbles in his relation with a plain-Jane scientist girlfriend Dr. Amy Fowler, while another married nerd, Howard Wolowitz, is still fixated on his mom even after he and his bride Bernadette are hitched. The other two are the nice-guy scientist Leonard Hofstetter who has an on and off relation with Nebraska beauty Penny, and transplanted-from-India Raj, a real ladies' man, who gets taken to bars on "girls' nights" by the ladies of the cast and whose sister had a affair with Leonard.

You won't see a lot real scientists on mainstream TV — no explorers, no men profiled who made breakthroughs like Dr. Jonas Salk or Doctors Banting and Best — nor anyone else of a strong, positive, masculine nature. On TV today, what passes for macho are the folks on shows like Appalachian Outlaws or Duck Dynasty. On Appalachian Outlaws, there's a bunch of guys with guns out in the wild, trying to make money on ginseng and animal fur and living like they did in the 1700s, just a few hundred miles from New York.  On the latter, Uncle Si and the women-run Robertson family are in the business of making duck calls, when they're not shilling for the American Zaxby's restaurant chain. Tim Allen, whose comic riffs on machismo became the inspiration of his first hit sitcom Home Improvement, now is in ABC's Last Man Standing. Here, he's a dad in houseful of females. And on Everybody Loves Raymond, a wimp who can write sports columns is pushed around by everyone — his cute wife, his domineering mom and his hulkish, constantly jealous big brother.

The long-running Frasier has Kelsey Grammer as a Boston shrink who moves to Seattle to do a radio call-in show, taking in his injured ex-cop dad and verbally sparring with his snooty brother Niles (who's no treasure either, what with his never-seen wife, whom he ditches for the loopy British therapist Daphne). In one memorable episode, a feud that Frasier has with a local writer that escalates into a fistfight challenge is called off thanks to his dad's interference. In another, an attempt to perform a live radio play has the smooth ,unflappable, "classy" Dr. Crane scrambling on the air as one disaster follows another.

Putting down whites, especially white males, has been a staple of Hollywood comedies and TV since The Karate Kid and long before that. Yeah, every time a white kid gets picked on at school it only takes a Pat Morita (or in the remake, Jackie Chan, helping a black kid) to give him the confidence and strength to pay back those bullies. It doesn't take a lot of effort to see how wimpy and stupid whites rule prime time TV. The white male in TV fiction has few roles— to be in service to the state, never challenging any tyranny forcefully or effectively, tolerating political correctness and all the damage is continues to do in society, and of course, as grunt kill-bots out to defend US females and capitalism in mercenary foreign missions against "the bearded ones" (fundamentalist patriarchal Muslims), as they are called in the drama Brothers.

Some portrayals of whites border on hate propaganda; one character on Big Bang Theory is a scientist with an Elmer Fudd-ish speech impediment, yet I have yet to hear any advocacy group beef to show creator/producer Chuck Lorre, or to Warner Brothers TV or CBS about it. Anger of that nature is reserved to defend nonwhites, don't you know. Frankly, it's getting tiresome. Surely there are white men in history — explorers, inventors, those whose ideas shaped human destiny, whose stories are far more entertaining  and informative than the latest Fred Flintstone schemes of Ray Barone to get out housework and babysitting and the negative portrayals of today's white man.

 

Harper's new anti-terror law threatens freedom

 

Stephen Harper truly is representative of the conservatives in Canada — including those of the Conservative Party. Two-facedness is the order of the day, as he crowed in more than one speech here at home and across the ocean, about the importance of 'defending freedom' while last week, Bill C-51 came before Parliament, that promised to erode what few freedoms Canadians have left to enjoy —including freedom of religion.

As a man, who, along with Don Andrews, sat in a cell years ago as 'justice' was decided, and tens of thousands of dollars was spent fighting the Trudeau 'hate laws' in a landmark case that made its way to Canada's Supreme Court, I have a stake in this new Bill C-51. You do, too. The Jim Keegstra case that many of you no doubt know was pretty much confined to Alberta, even though Mr. Keegstra lost his job as a teacher for his views on the Holocaust. The New Bill C-51 will affect the entire country, with greater police powers to raid, wiretap and detain suspects longer.

On the surface, Harper and the Conservatives were apparently going after jihadists who were planning or carried out, or even believed to be planning, terror attacks in the wake of the recent violence on Parliament Hill. These new powers, also known as the Anti-Terrorism Act, would allow law enforcement officials broader powers to make arrests if they suspect terrorist activity and increasing the period of preventative detention' to seven days from three.

 

As these new laws were being tabled last week, the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service was granted the right to directly intervene and disrupt anything regarded as subversive or 'terrorist'. It's the same crap George Bush used in the wake of 9/11, where his "Patriot Act" was just one tool of fear he used to justify snooping on anyone, anytime, considered an enemy of the state.

Don't expect the NDP's Thomas Mulcair to be strident in opposition against this draconian law; his leftist beliefs stop short when it comes to the feminist voters worries about fundamentalist Islam. As election time nears, he'll be silent about C-51. It was almost hilarious to see the media pundits claim that the New Democrat and Liberal Opposition parties were ready to raise hell over Bill C-51. Then there's Liberal leader Justin Trudeau's dad Pierre, who not only ushered in the original "promotion of hate" laws in the late 1960's and 1970's, and then mandated the mass importation of Third World immigrants and multiculturalism.

Stephen Harper said before he took office that we wouldn't recognize this country "by the time I'm finished with it." The nation was pretty hard to recognize when Pierre Trudeau finished his transformation of it in the 1970's. "Conservative" Harper proved he's just as willing to shove Draconian law down our throats, and it'll be a cake walk for his majority government as he prepares for an election, very possibly this spring. If the Conservatives don't win another mandate, don't expect the Liberals or the NDP to wipe these tyrannical laws from the books.

Something else that is funny — Harper's posturing like a macho-man about how we have [to] "get tough" with the specter and threat of radical Islam that doesn't exist. He's about as macho as "Hello Kitty" — looks like his wife's got him diapered and trained.

Not worried? "You've got nothing to worry about if you're not up to something" is the refrain from the pundits and the talk radio hosts. Remember, one of the main differences between a democracy and a tyranny is that in a democracy, you are in danger of losing all your freedom a little at a time, so slowly and imperceptibly, you hardly notice, until its too late. Or, ask anyone who's lived in the Eastern Bloc in Europe or Russia or Red China.

And since there's talk of an early election in the mind, I have only one piece of advice to you: Instead of voting for the NDP or the just-as-oppressive Liberals. vote independent. Once Bill C-51 becomes law, never mind Harper's speech BS about a dark force descending on us — the real darkness will befall all Canadians, as freedom of speech and religion become things of our past.