The Cost of Multiculturalism in Toronto

 

Hope you're enjoying your Christmas season. Here's a little something to think about as you're spending your money for presents, courtesy of Toronto Mayor David Miller: "By 2011, the police budget in Toronto will be a billion dollars."

 

Quoted in the December 19 National Post, our dear mayor just laid bare the trouble of policing and paying for policing in a city whose motto, both postered and practice, is "Diversity is our strength.” Anyone who has even so much as visited any major American city knows how incompatible multiculturalism and a healthy, safe metropolis is. Ever since the doors were flung open to the world just a few decades ago, Canada, and its major cities in particular, have experienced a surge in violence in many cases, much quicker and just as horrible as major American urban centers. Apparently, our mayor has a problem with the idea of spending a billion a year on policing, just to try to keep the streets safe; Toronto's finest just won a raise of nearly 10 percent over three years, this past week — more great news as our economy crashes and fries. It's just insanity to be tossing money away on non-services and idiotic internationalist projects like AIDS clinics in Botswana (that's a federal concern, and even that calls into question billions in foreign aid while Canadians and Torontonians sleep in their cars and on top of gratings).

 

It's time we shut down all our foreign offices and use the money saved to fix things and broken lives here. All we've gotten over the years for what must be trillions spent on foreign aid, misplaced humanitarianism, multicult and immigration are people who have usurped our Canadian/European  heritage, our Canadian/European way of doing things and our Canadian/European sense of order with mayhem, medical and health care chaos. Oh yeah, and the crime.

 

Right now, with a 70% clearance rate for serious crime, our police will soon be pricing themselves out of the law enforcement business to the point one day where this city will choose to keep order by hiring out to private contractors.

 

Don't laugh. The US tried it in Iraq and look what happened (one-word clue: Blackwater). Instead of begging for more — like Oliver Twist — the cops in charge should be pointing fingers at the real causers of violent crime — the non-white thugs and gangs, and do something effective (in other words, their jobs). Now that police are about to become a third army in urban areas, maybe Ottawa should finally start kicking in some millions — after all, they literally brought the problem here years ago and pretended what a great thing multiculturalism was — before Barry Cobby and Jane Creba became two of the many victims of "diversity.” Hey, just call it a failed experiment and shut it down.

 

Less immigrants, more money spent to bring them here, and spending our money on worthwhile projects and necessary services (infrastructure, snow and garbage removal, instead of midnight B-ball, multilingual programs, sensitivity seminars, and federal funds spent to fix our cities instead of destroying those of foreign lands. Spend it revitalizing our city centers; the US experience has seen non-white crime flourish and neglect in major American cities coast-to-coast as they crumble, wither and die. Will that be Toronto's fate? or Montreal's? Vancouver's? In many aspects, it is now. Let's put your money to work to stop it.  Charity begins at home.

 

 

Highway of Zeroes

 

Again it happened-- for no good reason, As Canadian news channels covered the homecoming and burial of a Canadian soldier, news broke that three more young Canadian lives were extinguished in this nation's latest insane mercenary adventure known as " The Afghanistan Mission."

Where to begin: In the first place, I do extend my sympathies to the families. Each of those who died had their own story.

One soldier, Cpl.James Hamilton -- "Hammy" to family and friends, was from Nova Scotia , enjoyed the outdoors and had a noticeable smile that won him many friends, while Private. Justin Jones worked as a youth advocate before his military career, and the third, Private. John Curwin, married his childhood sweetheart and had a son whom he played hockey with. In a way, when your bodies were returned, there was this macabre ritual that just adds to the needlessness of your death and the insanity of what you fought and died for.

It is this ritual of the bureaucratic corpse run, beginning with the death of the soldier and the medical examination to formalize the cause of death, just like on "CSI," followed by the ritualistic carrying and transport of the soldier's coffin to its final resting place and the new ceremony down the "Highway of Heroes" as the sad and stoic faces gathered on a bridge say prayers and a final goodbye to another life or two or three lost needlessly.

 

In World War I, the military lost between 10-20,000 in one afternoon of combat--that was the so-called war to end all wars. Today, we have the spectacle of mangled veterans of the War Amps touring schools with their "Never Again!" program, a peace project that somehow never made it to Parliament Hill and the Defense Department or any of its ministers ever since we stupidly involved ourselves in foreign adventures for the last several decades. (Where were they in the seventies when this nation was being invaded for cheap labour? And they keep on coming here, and they will be here long after the last of these dying men from wars past have drank their last Molson's. Thanks for keeping us safe, guys.

Three wasted lives out of over a hundred, all engaged in a war that a man who lost his nephew in Afghanistan called "a war that can't be won." It begs the question of what the blazes we are doing there, what of anything that could remotely be a close to a good excuse are we doing there?

National interest? No. The people of Afghanistan just wish to be left alone. So what if they want to live in another century? That is their right as human beings, and neither we nor any other nation has any right to decide "what's best" for them; so much for Bush's "so what" attitude toward his genocidal wars.

Helping other people, introducing them to Western 'culture'? Yeah, like the soldiers who we're just learning now were involved in the rape of Afghan boys as young as 12 dressed up like girls and referred to as "bitches" while their senior officers ( and chaplains, yes, supposed men of God) looked the other way since at least 2007, according to an article in the Toronto Star on December 14th.

Then there is the obscene amount of money made by war profiteers, and the other obscene amount spent (both in the billions) by our government on shells to kill shepherds and other innocents while so many in Canada go without food, shelter and clothing and our economy follows that of America's into the quicksand.

And there is the defense of it all, just like Bush defends his atrocities, with the same weasel words and worn-out phrases like "support the troops" — all the hoopla and gung-ho displayed, most disgustingly by Canadian Forces officers and media shills, along with the accelerated training of young recruits into kill-bots seething with bloodlust; it reminds me of an old martial arts movie where the fat sidekick of one of the in-shape fighters says, "Hey! Leave some for me to kill! (there's a new motto for the Canadian Forces; not as slick as "fight fear," but accurate).

All this, and what do we do about it? Spend money, effort and hand-wringing in tears, and a so-called "Highway of Heroes" to "honor the fallen." Can you in good conscience tell or explain to me what is so honorable or heroic about invading a foreign country with high-tech and low-tech weapons, tanks, copters, bombs, incendiaries and other ordinance, and people trained to kill, just to keep our foot on their necks and "protect" them from a demonized group of God-believers, maybe plunder their resources help ourselves to their women and children? Can you name any act of terror committed on Canadian soil that can even serve as a lame excuse for even considering sending one young life after another to their doom?

At my house, we proudly fly the Canadian flag, but not for, or at the service of military alliances like NATO or sovereign-stripping internationalist enforcers like the United Nation. Our dirty deeds at the behest of them and others is a blot on our nation's history and reputation

Mr. Harper, or Mr. Ignatieff or whoever ends up in charge of this nation after the current Parliamentary imbroglio is decided, I have six simple words for you: Get Canada Out of Afghanistan. Now. Put our soldiers to work here on public works, repairing the infrastructure of our roads and buildings, helping out during natural disasters and as a standby force to keep order in these turbulent times. It's a better was to spend your military careers than copping the nasty, venomous Col. Blimp attitude of "If you don't back the troops, feel free to stand in front of them."

Come home, troops, Leave people of other lands to lives their own lives and solve their own problems. Come home to where you are truly needed and end this disgrace, so that we may restore honor to the reputation of our military and our country.

BOB's TV TIPS

STOP-LOSS (Movie Network, Dec. 19, 9 pm*) The US government's dirty catch-22 policy of forcing its soldiers to serve past their designated tour of duty forms the basis of this drama starring Ryan Phillipe.

FATHER OF THE PRIDE (Teletoon Fridays at 10 pm) John Goodman, who hasn't had a hit TV series since Roseanne left the air. provides the voice of the head of a family of lions in Las Vegas in this 2004 CGI-animated NBC clunker of a few seasons back. Yet, it's your only local alternative to The National and OMNI's Simpsons reruns.

 

 

Jihad's Beginnings

 

THE SIEGE OF MECCA

by Yaroslav Trofimo

(Random House/Doubleday, 287 pages)

 

If there is one force that has most certainly dominated foreign news, it is the resurgence of fundamentalist Islam, along with the many organizations who have found a new way to bring Islam back to force as a respected major world religion. Today, as in Islam's early years, men have sacrificed their very lives in defense of Islam and Muslim precepts, in the Koran and in their every day lives. The problem with how many of us see Islam, is that there is a lot of it that doesn't reach the public eyes and ears — just the propaganda in word and image that "interprets" Islam's true believers as nothing but violent, destructive fanatics. When one considers that so many of these young men are willing to die for their faith, it does give one pause to think that the last time Christianity felt the same way en masse was during the Crusades (and for those Christians who have a problem with religion and violence I have only these words: Spanish, and Inquisition.

 

The backlash against Muslims is made even more tragic and ironic when you consider that you have a group of people who espouse the ideology, values of the God of the same Old Testament as Muslims. In today's secular world, the idea of people ready to die for God is for the most part, misunderstood and misinterpreted. "Jihad" —or "holy war" — has become a latter-twentieth century phenomenon borne of anger over the West's imperialism and obedience to Zionism. The Siege of Mecca tries to put this all in perspective, and also provides a rare perspective on one of fundamentalist Islam's  best-known (i.e., maligned), yet little-known groups.

 

The interfering machinations o the Saudis, Americans and French are well-evidenced as this book gives great focus to the founding and early days of the most reverent Sunni Wahhabis and the division between them and the Shi'ites. starting with the telling of the tale of the dispute over the succession after the death of Mohammad in 632; The tensions and machinations that would continue for over 1,300 years (egged on by the dirty dealings of Europe, the USA and in the twentieth century, the newly-created Zionist state of Israel) would culminate in 1979 with the siege of Mecca's Grand Mosque. As a work that delves into the rift between a group of Muslims true to the tenets of the Koran and a group more secularized, and how internationalists sought to exploit and control that part of the world, only to see the rise of an angry new force that ironically, believed in the same Old Testament that forms the basis for Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

 

The past few American presidents' handling of the new rise of Islam ranged from badly misinterpreting (and relying on liars for advice and  bungling the situation) to all -out mass murder of peasants, women, children  and holy men;  the book focuses on the Carter administration's snafus and the internationalist/Zionist hidden hand who guided every misstep along the way, with the help of the controlled media.

 

How the next few years and the new Barack Obama administration's handling of the issue of fundamentalist Islam on the world stage go is anybody guess. I'm not betting on much improvement with new Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The best way we can all prepare for what well may be an uncertain relationship with Muslims nations as their numbers and populations grow is to learn to see them and their history with a fair heart and an unbigoted eye.

 

Oh, yeah, and don't believe those Old Glory-waving dolts on Fox News Channel when it comes to Muslims and Islam; read for yourself about al-Qaeda and it's roots. The Siege of Mecca is a good place to start. If your local bookstore or chain outlet doesn't have it, go here: http://www.randomhouse.com/doubleday/siegeofmecca/

 

 

Jews Crucify O.J. Simpson

 

The first time I ever remember seeing Orenthal James Simpson was as a young'n. He was running through an airport, in a hurry — but it was to get a car as part of a Hertz Rent-a-car commercial. Before his famous trouble with the law, he had built up quite a reputation as both a professional athlete with the NFL's Buffalo Bills, and later as an actor in films like The Towering Inferno and the Naked Gun trilogy.

This of course, was before he became the central figure of one the most controversial and most-publicized trials in American history. It was a trial that touched on many issues: the power of the media in trials involving the famous, the U.S. legal system itself being in a sense put on trial; and the biggest issue of all: race and justice. O.J. was convicted and last week imprisoned for anywhere from 15 to up to 33 years...and not for murder. He already was put on trial for that once, and was found not guilty. In the USA, so the belief and practice of law goes, you cannot be tried twice for the same crime (it's known as 'double jeopardy"). However, if you're of a certain celebrity status, there is a different standard of law that applies--the tabloids are full of examples and in court last week, a female Jewish judge Jackie Glass proved it. O.J. was tried and convicted for robbery with a deadly weapon, assault and kidnapping, in an imbroglio over not money, but memorabilia that was allegedly stolen from him, the case was catapulted from a legal matter into a bizarre Hollywood sequel drama/reality show trial.

And then, there is one Mr. Fred Goldman and the Goldman family, to whom more than $33 million was awarded in a civil suit relating to the murder of their son. The malevolence he displayed to the media and glee over the ham-fisted way Judge Glass laid the hammer down on Mr. Simpson is just part of the tragic exploitation of the deaths of two people, exploitation that everyone seemed to have a hand in.

First of all, I feel sympathy for the loss of their son, especially in the brutal manner that he died along with his girlfriend Nicole. They have every right to grieve. But the extent to which they manifested their anger to achieve a twisted version of justice, can be best described in one word: unjust.

I believe in fair play, everywhere, and that includes the judicial system. If a man is brought to trial, and the state finds him guilty, he must be punished. In the Simpson murder trial. O.J. was tried and set free. He had his day in court and the rest is now public knowledge — at least to the public who watched the Zionist-controlled TV and news outlets.

I consider myself a friend to all whites, but fair is fair. To sentence any man for a period that goes beyond what is just and appropriate for what amounts to nothing more than alleged theft, is nothing short of medieval. And being perceived as being mean, vindictive punishers is largely why whites are hated by other races and by other religions. History shows that whites can and have been cruel and unfair to other races, and real racists believe in good will and fair play as a cornerstone of that ideology. It's being unfair in the past that screwed us up and continues to do so to this day. So let's at least be fair in this matter; we need as a people to get past the lynch-mob mentality and perception of ourselves, since the media will now doubt have a field day with this story and new fortunes will be made by and through the Zionist-controlled TV, movie studios, and news organizations and publishers as to who will have the real last word on O.J. Simpson.

The final result of this last chapter of this story will surely create and widen the schism among many blacks and Jews in America, given the length they went to in the courts and in all media to crucify Mr. Simpson. In the end, in all likelihood, there will be no winners, just two dead young people and a family and a legal system picking over their remains and defiling their loved ones' spirits.

Now that's an American tragedy.

 

 

India’s 9/11

 

Mumbai.

The very mention of the word these days sets off a lot of emotion, argument and passion, and also analysis as to what happened in India late last month. There has been and will continue to be a lot of finger-pointing as to who was the brains behind the attacks that put Mumbai under siege for a week, what organization(s) put up the money and planning for it and yes, even the double quandaries of what nation(s) had a hand in it and — wait for it — was the CIA and/or Mossad involved?

We've heard most of the angles: India and Pakistan blame each other, it was an al-Qaeda front, it was the relatively-unknown Lashkar-el-Taiba, it was ... you get the idea.

Early in the TV coverage, outlets such as India's Star News referred to the Mumbai attacks as "India's 9/11." Many people have speculated that the attacks were just as they believed 9/11, a set-up job. But let's review a few things we've learned now that the dust has settled and piano virtuoso Condoleezza Rice has headed over to India for what is surely to be a useless effort to de-fuse the new tinderbox.

One thing is for certain: Despite all the hue and cry about yet another "Islamic terrorist threat," this one just smacks of an outside job. Early reports about those allegedly involved in the attacks reported them consuming various recreational drugs, including cocaine, as well as booze. Real Muslims do not consume alcohol. And there was the matter that there was advance warning to the targeted hotels about the attacks, with the whole city of Mumbai still appearing to be caught pants-down in what was depicted by the media as a well-coordinated operation. And how about the cops who didn't fire on them. They stood down while the rest of the world believed that Mumbai was descending into chaos. The attacks and their aftermath, leave too many questions, suggesting a CIA and/or Mossad operation/involvement, perhaps even as a "Manchurian Candidate" mission, with a bunch of pre-programmed "zealots" being released like unmanned predator drones. And no self-respecting group of militants would use cell-phone communications or leave cell phone evidence lying around — the CIA has the capability of picking up and recording any call made anywhere in the world at any time.

The entire area of secular India, the Franken-country of Pakistan and disputed Kashmir (funny how none of those who took Mumbai demanded freedom for Kashmir — it was one of the lines that the media tried to shill to the public as to their "motives"), has re-entered the front pages with the opening media line "No one's heard of this new L.E.T.," yet with purposely-left trails all over, you have to wonder. With the USA traditionally buddy-buddy with Pakistan's enemy India, the Mumbai attacks offered the perfect excuse to put Pakistan on the griddle to control their own militants. It stands to reason the West is in India's corner: India is the epitome of capitalism, the nation where you are born into your job and the caste system still remains, despite its modernistic trappings. It's the perfect partner for capitalism, which needs dismantling a lot faster than the current economic slowdown suggests that is taking place. And, India's part of the nuclear club now, a pretty handy membership with all that money and rising economic strength, It is a land where nothing is what it seems, in appearance and behind the scenes.

The timing of Mumbai couldn't be better, as a new president prepares to take office and has other distractions on his plate from other US imperialist failed wars to try to save face over, to the troubled economy where billions are being asked for and handed out to failed banks and the gone-blooey auto industry, like the jackpot on a quiz show.
There at present, 150 million Muslims in India alone; at that rate, it's bound to fall apart as the Muslim resurgence overtakes the Middle East and south Asia. Yet there is more now to the mysterious image of "Incredible India" (as it's promoted by the country's tourism department); .there is a mystery of a heavily-hyped as a major terrorist attack that is shadows within shadows upon an area that is complex, fragile, and even to the new Obama administration, will call for greater attention (including, perhaps, the covering of Indian government hiney with the aid of new Secretary of State Hillary Clinton?) At this writing, the airports of India are still on high alert amid "warnings" of more attacks; it remind me of that famous color-coded Security Alerts we saw constantly on TV after 9/11 (I think the blue color meant "low risk of terrorist activity": things never did get back to "Low risk").

 

Either way, developments in that part of the world and future "revelations" on Mumbai should be most interesting, for the people of the region and for people from the region who now call North America home (many no doubt already under System scrutiny and surveillance).

Just don't believe everything the talking heads at CNN or BBC World Channel tell you.

 

 

Only White Nationalist Leaders Need Apply

 

In 1985, after years of debate in Canada's Parliament and the report of the "Cohen Commission on Hate Literature in Canada," my co-accused Don Andrews I and became the first two Canadians to be tried, convicted and imprisoned for our political views on immigration and multiculturalism — or in the eyes of the law, "promoting hatred.” Almost 24 years later, after events in Canada (largely, the skyrocketing non-white crime rate in Canadian cities, which got so bad that the Ontario government is finally considering compiling race-based crime statistics), we feel vindicated. In addition, there is a new hue and cry from the media who clamored for the tightening of the so-called "hate laws." Except this time, it is to lobby to repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights code to purge it of the clause that calls for censorship of alleged 'hate speech' over the Internet.

There's new attention being paid to so-called hate speech lately; on November 25, no less than five items, news stories about the latest trial of David Ahenakew, and related op-ed pieces, appeared in both national papers, The Globe and Mail and the National Post. In that week, I received the December issue of the Canadian Alliance for Free Expression's Free Speech Monitor, which updated the cases of Melissa Guille and Terry Tremaine, The former received a chiding from the Canadian Human Rights Commission (no fine was levied) and a forced "consultation" with the CHRC order, in which Miss Guille not only had to stop posting what they considered "hate," but check with them continuously until October 14, 2009, to see to it she complies. In the case of Terry Tremaine, known on the Stormfront site as "mathdoktor," he was banned from posting on Stormfront and had to jump through legal hoops to obtain details of the Crown's case against him after being charged under Section 319 — the "promoting hate" statute of the Canadian Criminal Code.

It beings to mind the numerous "hate speech" cases that have gone before the courts and received massive media attention for years, most prominent among them being the Ernst Zündel "false news" case and the hate trial of Alberta teacher James Keegstra. In both cases, these gentlemen had a rare opportunity to go before the dogs of what's called justice in this nation and to stand alone and expose their tyranny to the world. Instead, they chose to use members of the legal profession — that's right, members of the very Establishment they are up against — to plead their cases and suck up and stick-handle through these tyrannical kangaroo courts and proceedings. We all know the results of having someone plead your case when they don't have Clue One about your motivations, what you believe, and the very evil of even having these laws and statutes and tribunals in existence. Better to go in there like a sheriff in an old Western with proverbial guns a-blazin' and bellow about the unfairness and rottenness of even questioning or trying to modify with the club of the law our right of Freedom of Expression than to play their game by their rules.

Back in the old days of this movement, people used to sit in restaurants and think about how the Reds were wrecking this country; the talk, sure, led to action, from the formation of the Edmund Burke Society to the Western Guard in the 1970's and to today's Nationalist Party. Today, thanks to the Internet, we can reach more people faster and better (the proof being the column you are reading now). Yet still, we have these White Nationalist leader wannabes who either waste their time on the rubber chicken circuit still telling us we're going to hell or are too afraid to or get in the way of real White Nationalist leaders developing and growing. Many organizations have developed cliques to stop or hinder communication with those leaders and organizations who are making a difference. And when a "dissident" goes before a court or human rights kangaroo tribunal, their 'mentors' are always there with a lawyer or try to speak for the accused, instead of letting them develop into personalities — and perhaps future rivals. Petty jealousy has long been the bane of White Nationalism, coupled with those who corral and try to neutralize potential new leaders, too many times at the behest of the System. The petty jealousy and reaction of some people is very telling of a suspicious motive: whenever an "activist" laughs or ridicules a new personality, you know something's up. And then there's the cowardly use the word racialist by too many groups. Please! It's racist, got it?

Heaven forbid one of these "patriot" groups figure a way with their establishment barrister pals to use these tyrannical laws against the tormentors who put them on the books. So far, only one group in Canada came up with the idea of turning the tables on the tyrants in the media and the legal establishment and using the hate laws against them — the Muslims, whose most famous case involved the Mark Steyn article The Future Belongs to Islam in Macleans magazine.

And who benefits if only the establishment media (magazines, newspapers, radio, TV) are allowed to criticize non-white crime or Israel's bulldozing of homes and brutalizing the Palestinians? If the courts of Canada, the laws of this nation and our court officers (including the ten provincial Attorney-Generals whose okay must be secured before hate speech prosecutions) are left to prosecute "hate,” we're certainly going to see a lot of present and future commie human rights tribunal panel members out on the cold.

Meanwhile, the same petty search-and-neutralize game goes on, wherein new voices get silenced and only the "safe" racism is practiced. But remember, the "turf war" between provincial human rights tribunals and attorney-generals as to who will have exclusive rights to "clean up hate" won't stop the repression of our right of freedom of speech.

For White Nationalists, there is a lesson here: if you want to be a White Nationalist leader, do your research, know your ideology backwards and forwards, and don't, whatever you do, don't let a bought-and-paid-for-lawyer or some smart-aleck reporter, news anchor, interviewer or smarmy Mike Duffy talk-show host interpret your views for you. You get up and "represent."

There is a surfeit of real White Nationalist leaders now directing the movement. We've had decades of leaders of many calibers — National Socialist, White Nationalist, Klan (both hooded and suit-and-tie), "patriots" and "dissidents" on both sides of the 49th parallel, and so on. Some have advanced the profile and progress of White Nationalism.

Unfortunately, many of them have either bungled the job, and/or allowed their ranks to be swelled by agent-provocateurs, bigots, troublemakers and spies. Some leaders have spent much of their careers deriding, plotting against and tolerating treachery against real racist leaders while running outfits that are nothing more than sandboxes and flypaper where it's easier for the feds, cops, etc., to keep an eye on up-and-comers which may have to be "neutralized" or kept ineffectual.

The next few years, with the financial crisis ahead and more repression in the wings, will be crucial. The next generation of White Nationalists who will direct this movement and plot its future course must be leaders. Not eccentric nut cases, agent-provocateur rabble rousers, khaki fans, wannabes, media pretty-boys who will get themselves compromised and neutralized, screw up and set us two steps back for each step forward we plant. Our future leaders and spokespeople must learn from the mistakes of the past and lead this movement with wisdom, responsibility and courage. And they must NOT allow anyone except themselves to face those who would try to shut them up using the club of "the law.” They must be ready to stand up and be brave and eloquent spokesmen of our ideology. Only real White Nationalists need apply.

To paraphrase the old song, the line forms on the right, babe.

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

BOB'S BEAT Archives:  Page   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10